Four scenarios for the SpaceX IPO
Table of contents
SpaceX is reportedly planning the largest IPO in history, raising $75B with a target market cap of $1.75T. According to The Financial Times, Elon Musk is personally driving the terms of the IPO.[1]
In a typical IPO, the underwriters choose the offering terms after discussions with potential buyers, a process known as “bookbuilding.” In contrast, The Financial Times reports:
Musk’s influence over the size and timing of the listing has been highly unusual, said one investor close to a banker on the deal. “It’s kind of scary how Elon is setting the price, it’s not being done formally,” they said.
In a typical IPO, the existing shareholders are not allowed to sell their shares until 180 days have passed. In contrast, The Financial Times reports:
Bankers involved are toying with the idea of allowing existing shareholders to sell out of their positions on day one, two of the people said … SpaceX is considering a so-called staggered lock-up that would allow initial investors to slowly sell down their stakes over the course of several months.
Last, as I’ve previously discussed, many index providers are reportedly considering changing their rules to allow SpaceX to be swiftly added to the indices (Nasdaq has already changed its rules for the Nasdaq-100).
In this piece, I sketch out four possible scenarios for the SpaceX IPO. What follows is merely a thought experiment and is neither a prediction nor investment advice.
Scenario 1: Complete Triumph
As the IPO date approaches, SpaceX fever grips the world. Prices of related securities rise in anticipation, including Tesla, EchoStar (which owns shares in SpaceX), and various funds claiming to own shares in SpaceX.[2]
Elon’s epic showmanship creates enormous demand for SpaceX shares. Instead of the traditional IPO roadshow, Elon dazzles potential investors by bringing them to the launch site in Florida to witness the launch of a Falcon 9.
The day before the IPO, the underwriters revise the offer price upward from $30 to $50 due to high demand. It turns out Elon’s initial valuation was too conservative, and the IPO is massively oversubscribed.
When trading opens, the market price swiftly rises to $110, more than double the offer price of $50, thanks to a tsunami of retail buying. This “first day pop” in price rise instantly creates dozens of new SpaceX billionaires.
Fifteen trading days later, there’s a wave of buying by index funds thanks to the new index inclusion rules. The process goes smoothly, and there’s minimal price volatility as insiders sell and index funds buy. In the months that follow, share prices climb ever higher as SpaceX generates astronomical profits from its operations.
Scenario 2: Mixed Success
Due to Elon’s aggressive valuation, demand for the IPO is tepid. The underwriters heroically manage to drum up enough buy orders at the offer price of $30, but just barely. When trading starts, the price is only prevented from falling by extensive “price stabilization” by the underwriters.
In the days that follow, the price drifts downward and the offering is seen as a disappointment similar to the 2012 Facebook IPO. As SpaceX insiders sell in the initial weeks, they’re widely condemned for driving the price downward. On day 15, the index funds buy in a chaotic process that generates substantial price volatility and further criticism.
Scenario 3: Train Wreck
As the IPO date approaches, there are growing questions about the optimistic projections in SpaceX’s S-1 filing. In a stroke of bad luck, a Falcon 9 rocket explodes on the launch pad at an investor event, showering debris on the assembled institutional investors. After a large European sovereign wealth fund declines to participate in the IPO, Elon briefly suspends Starlink service in northern Europe.
As the world falls into recession amid continuing Mideast conflict, global stock markets fall. Elon insists that the IPO go forward as planned despite unfavorable market conditions. The IPO day is a disaster, with the market price falling to $19, far below the offer price of $30 despite frantic efforts by the underwriters. Elon rages against short-sellers in a profanity-laced series of tweets, seemingly unaware that short selling is virtually impossible immediately after the IPO.
Prices continue to fall in the ensuing three weeks to around $10. On trading day 15, the day that SpaceX is added to major indices at the close, prices rise to $15 by 3pm in chaotic trading. At the closing auction, when the index funds must buy, the print comes in at $20. But the next day, price falls right back down to $10, delivering instant losses to the hapless index investors. In the subsequent months, SpaceX’s price continues to fall amid disappointing operational results, along with a wave of lawsuits.
Scenario 4: IPO Withdrawn
Revelations in the SpaceX S-1 filing unleash a chorus of condemnation, similar to the reaction to WeWork’s S-1 in August 2019. At the same time, global stock markets collapse after oil prices soar to $300 per barrel.
Elon insists that the IPO go forward as planned. After a public feud with his investment bankers, however, he reluctantly cancels the IPO only 24 hours before trading was scheduled to commence. This decision is even more last-minute than the stunning withdrawal of the Ant Financial IPO in November 2020 (also touted as history’s largest IPO), 36 hours before scheduled trading.
Elon tweets that he is delighted that SpaceX can continue as a private company and he never really wanted to go public anyway. He declares that he has “funding secured” from unspecified sources to continue SpaceX’s mission to “expand consciousness to the stars.”
The Aftermath
I have no idea which scenario might occur; perhaps something else entirely will take place. Whatever happens, it will undoubtedly impact the ability of other firms to go public later in 2026. A successful SpaceX offering might pave the way for OpenAI and Anthropic to go public. A disastrous one might close the door, at least for a while.
As I’ve previously discussed, the U.S. is currently enduring an epic IPO drought. The SpaceX IPO might be like a torrential rainstorm in this parched landscape. The downpour could bring forth a flowering of life and greenery, or it could bring destructive flash floods. Be ready for anything.
Endnotes
[1] All references to the Financial Times come from “SpaceX boosts IPO ambition with plans to raise $75bn,” The Financial Times, March 25, 2026.
[2] References to this and other companies should not be interpreted as recommendations to buy or sell specific securities. Acadian and/or the author of this post may hold positions in one or more securities associated with these companies.
Don't miss the next Owenomics
Subscribe to receive new articles as they are published from Senior Portfolio Manager and Research, Owen Lamont
Legal Disclaimer
These materials provided herein may contain material, non-public information within the meaning of the United States Federal Securities Laws with respect to Acadian Asset Management LLC, Acadian Asset Management Inc. and/or their respective subsidiaries and affiliated entities. The recipient of these materials agrees that it will not use any confidential information that may be contained herein to execute or recommend transactions in securities. The recipient further acknowledges that it is aware that United States Federal and State securities laws prohibit any person or entity who has material, non-public information about a publicly-traded company from purchasing or selling securities of such company, or from communicating such information to any other person or entity under circumstances in which it is reasonably foreseeable that such person or entity is likely to sell or purchase such securities.
Acadian provides this material as a general overview of the firm, our processes and our investment capabilities. It has been provided for informational purposes only. It does not constitute or form part of any offer to issue or sell, or any solicitation of any offer to subscribe or to purchase, shares, units or other interests in investments that may be referred to herein and must not be construed as investment or financial product advice. Acadian has not considered any reader's financial situation, objective or needs in providing the relevant information.
The value of investments may fall as well as rise and you may not get back your original investment. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance or returns. Acadian has taken all reasonable care to ensure that the information contained in this material is accurate at the time of its distribution, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of such information.
This material contains privileged and confidential information and is intended only for the recipient/s. Any distribution, reproduction or other use of this presentation by recipients is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient and this presentation has been sent or passed on to you in error, please contact us immediately. Confidentiality and privilege are not lost by this presentation having been sent or passed on to you in error.
Acadian’s quantitative investment process is supported by extensive proprietary computer code. Acadian’s researchers, software developers, and IT teams follow a structured design, development, testing, change control, and review processes during the development of its systems and the implementation within our investment process. These controls and their effectiveness are subject to regular internal reviews, at least annual independent review by our SOC1 auditor. However, despite these extensive controls it is possible that errors may occur in coding and within the investment process, as is the case with any complex software or data-driven model, and no guarantee or warranty can be provided that any quantitative investment model is completely free of errors. Any such errors could have a negative impact on investment results. We have in place control systems and processes which are intended to identify in a timely manner any such errors which would have a material impact on the investment process.
Acadian Asset Management LLC has wholly owned affiliates located in London, Singapore, and Sydney. Pursuant to the terms of service level agreements with each affiliate, employees of Acadian Asset Management LLC may provide certain services on behalf of each affiliate and employees of each affiliate may provide certain administrative services, including marketing and client service, on behalf of Acadian Asset Management LLC.
Acadian Asset Management LLC is registered as an investment adviser with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any level of skill or training.
Acadian Asset Management (Singapore) Pte Ltd, (Registration Number: 199902125D) is licensed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. It is also registered as an investment adviser with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Acadian Asset Management (Australia) Limited (ABN 41 114 200 127) is the holder of Australian financial services license number 291872 ("AFSL"). It is also registered as an investment adviser with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Under the terms of its AFSL, Acadian Asset Management (Australia) Limited is limited to providing the financial services under its license to wholesale clients only. This marketing material is not to be provided to retail clients.
Acadian Asset Management (UK) Limited is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority ('the FCA') and is a limited liability company incorporated in England and Wales with company number 05644066. Acadian Asset Management (UK) Limited will only make this material available to Professional Clients and Eligible Counterparties as defined by the FCA under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive, or to Qualified Investors in Switzerland as defined in the Collective Investment Schemes Act, as applicable.
