Fear of missing out on global catastrophe (FOMOOGC)
In recent months, gold and silver have exhibited incredible price volatility. Why? Because they’ve transformed from boring commodities traded by professionals into exciting gambling instruments traded by retail investors. Forget meme stocks, we’ve entered the age of meme metals.
Fear and greed usually fight with each other, but they work together when it comes to precious metals. Gold and silver combine the appeal of geopolitical catastrophism with gee-whiz “number go up” optimism. You can be simultaneously bearish on late-stage capitalism but bullish on bullion.
Do not attempt to rationalize the recent price convulsions of precious metals as logical responses to news about the Fed. That approach only works for non-meme assets such as nominal U.S. Treasuries, inflation-indexed bonds, and foreign currencies. Gold and silver are dancing frenetically to their own incomprehensible melody.
I use the word “transmogrify” to describe an asset departing the mundane world of logic and facts and moving into the upside-down realm of meme madness. For now, gold and silver have transmogrified into meme assets. Similarly, GameStop transmogrified from a normal stock into a meme stock in January 2021.[1] Such transmogrification is common in the Korean equity market, especially during exciting events such as elections, as normal stocks transmogrify into “theme stocks.” Sometimes Korean theme stocks revert back to normal after a few months (for example, once the election is over); sometimes they remain theme stocks for years. The prerequisites for transmogrification are narrative potential, retail traders, and limited supply.
Precious metals have the ultimate narrative: the world is descending into a new Dark Age, so why not buy what worked in the previous Dark Age? When I got my first finance job in 1988, Wall Street was still teeming with vast herds of gold bugs, largely elderly men wearing bow ties. Today’s gold bugs may have lost their bow ties, but they still enjoy telling blood-curdling tales about the imminent collapse of fiat money.[2] It’s not important whether these narratives are true; what’s important is that they are compelling.[3]
Thanks to ETFs, retail investors can easily trade gold and silver in the U.S. stock market. Precious metal ETFs have been heavily purchased in recent days by Korean retail investors. Use of leverage via options and levered ETFs has amplified the impact of retail sentiment.
When it comes to metals, Korean retail investors are overshadowed by a larger group: Chinese retail investors. Unlike individual U.S. stocks, gold and silver can be traded in mainland China, and Chinese retail demand played a role in recent price swings. Imagine how much worse the GameStop episode in 2021 would have been if mainland Chinese investors had been allowed to participate.
Perhaps the most important prerequisite is limited supply. The genius of Bitcoin is that it is scarce by design; in contrast, precious metals are scarce by nature. And both Bitcoin and metals are superior to equities in this regard, because the supply of equities is not fixed. In the case of GameStop, for example, the company issued more shares following the mania in January 2021.
We can see the importance of limited supply by comparing gold and silver. The total market value of all physical gold is much greater than the market value of all silver (5X to 10X higher). Consequently, it’s easier for retail investors to move the price of silver than the price of gold, resulting in much higher recent volatility for silver than for gold. We see this dynamic also in meme stocks: in the “quantum” mania of late 2024, only smaller cap stocks were impacted.
As the price of gold has risen, the price of Bitcoin has fallen. Why buy “digital gold” when you can buy real gold or at least an ETF for real gold? Gold has many advantages that Bitcoin lacks:
- Product placement: the King James Bible mentions gold 417 times, while the hit song from KPop Demon Hunters is “Golden.” Even the original Bitcoin white paper mentions gold.
- Market penetration: many Americans have physical gold with them at all times in the form of wedding rings or other jewelry. In 2024, Costco began selling gold bars.
- Diversification benefits: gold’s correlation with equities is typically around zero.
Gold and silver have always been prone to bursts of extreme price volatility, sometimes involving market manipulation. Gold plunged in September 1869 due to the unraveling of an attempt at market manipulation. And silver’s price gyrated violently in March 1980 due to a similar scheme by the Hunt brothers. Both incidents were later depicted in Hollywood films.[4]
The difference is that today’s volatility is being driven by retail investors, armed with the new technology of trading apps and social media. While some buyers of gold and silver are motivated by narratives about the demise of fiat money, others just want to buy whatever has gone up. These return-chasing investors are pursuing a wealth-destroying strategy of “buy high, sell low.”[5]
You’ve probably heard that “all that glitters is not gold.” Versions of this quote appear throughout history, but most relevant is its appearance as the last line of a 1747 poem entitled Ode on the Death of a Favourite Cat, Drowned in a Tub of Goldfishes. I fear that today, retail investors are risking a similar fate.
Endnotes
[1] References to this and other companies should not be interpreted as recommendations to buy or sell specific securities. Acadian and/or the author of this post may hold positions in one or more securities associated with these companies.
[2] For a depiction of this group, see Ritholtz, Barry. “12 Rules of Goldbuggery,” The Big Picture, April 16, 2013.
[3] For example, one narrative is that gold’s price is being driven up by central bank buying. Robin Brooks dismissed this narrative as “bogus” in “Debunking the myth of central bank gold buying,” October 2025.
[4] Cary Grant starred in 1937’s The Toast of New York about the gold market. 1983’s Trading Places (starring Eddie Murphy and Dan Akroyd) was inspired by the silver market, with the fictional Duke brothers instead of the real Hunt brothers.
[5] As argued by Erb and Harvey (2025) for the specific case of gold ETFs and by Ben-David, Franzoni, Kim, and Moussawi (2023) in the case of thematic ETFs generally.
References
Ben-David, Itzhak, Francesco Franzoni, Byungwook Kim, and Rabih Moussawi. "Competition for Attention in the ETF Space." The Review of Financial Studies 36, no. 3 (2023): 987-1042.
Erb, Claude B., and Campbell R. Harvey. "Understanding Gold." Available at SSRN (2025).
Legal Disclaimer
These materials provided herein may contain material, non-public information within the meaning of the United States Federal Securities Laws with respect to Acadian Asset Management LLC, Acadian Asset Management Inc. and/or their respective subsidiaries and affiliated entities. The recipient of these materials agrees that it will not use any confidential information that may be contained herein to execute or recommend transactions in securities. The recipient further acknowledges that it is aware that United States Federal and State securities laws prohibit any person or entity who has material, non-public information about a publicly-traded company from purchasing or selling securities of such company, or from communicating such information to any other person or entity under circumstances in which it is reasonably foreseeable that such person or entity is likely to sell or purchase such securities.
Acadian provides this material as a general overview of the firm, our processes and our investment capabilities. It has been provided for informational purposes only. It does not constitute or form part of any offer to issue or sell, or any solicitation of any offer to subscribe or to purchase, shares, units or other interests in investments that may be referred to herein and must not be construed as investment or financial product advice. Acadian has not considered any reader's financial situation, objective or needs in providing the relevant information.
The value of investments may fall as well as rise and you may not get back your original investment. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance or returns. Acadian has taken all reasonable care to ensure that the information contained in this material is accurate at the time of its distribution, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of such information.
This material contains privileged and confidential information and is intended only for the recipient/s. Any distribution, reproduction or other use of this presentation by recipients is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient and this presentation has been sent or passed on to you in error, please contact us immediately. Confidentiality and privilege are not lost by this presentation having been sent or passed on to you in error.
Acadian’s quantitative investment process is supported by extensive proprietary computer code. Acadian’s researchers, software developers, and IT teams follow a structured design, development, testing, change control, and review processes during the development of its systems and the implementation within our investment process. These controls and their effectiveness are subject to regular internal reviews, at least annual independent review by our SOC1 auditor. However, despite these extensive controls it is possible that errors may occur in coding and within the investment process, as is the case with any complex software or data-driven model, and no guarantee or warranty can be provided that any quantitative investment model is completely free of errors. Any such errors could have a negative impact on investment results. We have in place control systems and processes which are intended to identify in a timely manner any such errors which would have a material impact on the investment process.
Acadian Asset Management LLC has wholly owned affiliates located in London, Singapore, and Sydney. Pursuant to the terms of service level agreements with each affiliate, employees of Acadian Asset Management LLC may provide certain services on behalf of each affiliate and employees of each affiliate may provide certain administrative services, including marketing and client service, on behalf of Acadian Asset Management LLC.
Acadian Asset Management LLC is registered as an investment adviser with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any level of skill or training.
Acadian Asset Management (Singapore) Pte Ltd, (Registration Number: 199902125D) is licensed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. It is also registered as an investment adviser with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Acadian Asset Management (Australia) Limited (ABN 41 114 200 127) is the holder of Australian financial services license number 291872 ("AFSL"). It is also registered as an investment adviser with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Under the terms of its AFSL, Acadian Asset Management (Australia) Limited is limited to providing the financial services under its license to wholesale clients only. This marketing material is not to be provided to retail clients.
Acadian Asset Management (UK) Limited is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority ('the FCA') and is a limited liability company incorporated in England and Wales with company number 05644066. Acadian Asset Management (UK) Limited will only make this material available to Professional Clients and Eligible Counterparties as defined by the FCA under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive, or to Qualified Investors in Switzerland as defined in the Collective Investment Schemes Act, as applicable.
Don't miss the next Owenomics
Subscribe to receive new articles as they are published from Senior Portfolio Manager and Research, Owen Lamont
